Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Segal's avatar

The quotes in this article don't capture what got people so upset. The Crimson listed the 3 hypotheses that Summers raised, of which the second ruffled many feathers:

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/6/9/the-worlds-that-started-the-war/

"... his second point, saying that there is “relatively clear evidence” that there may be a greater variance between men and women in aptitude areas such as mathematical and scientific ability, which may account for more men rising to top positions in these fields."

This was considered heresy by journalists. As I pediatric neurologist and neuroscientist I reached out to one of the journalists to provide the expertise from our field that 2/3 of our patients with intellectual disability were male, and part of this was due to many X-linked genetic forms of intellectual disability. These conditions affect females less than males because females have 2 copies of the X chromosome and thus a better chance of having a conventional copy of a gene (111 such conditions are listed at https://omim.org/phenotypicSeries/PS309530 and https://omim.org/phenotypicSeries/PS309510).

To account for this predominance of intellectual disability among males one would need to conclude either that males on average had lower intelligence than females, or that males had a similar average intelligence to females but had a greater variance in ability (as Summers enunciated in the second hypotheses). The journalist was completely uninterested in the facts and their implications; journalists at the time were determined to harm Summers regardless of the data.

Summers was not only successful in provoking thought on this issue but was also successful in provoking experimentation. I carried out an experiment to explore Summers' theme of finding ways to enhance the participation of females in STEM subjects. Using the GameMaker object oriented programming environment for kids, we taught our boys (11 and 5 years old) and girl (8) how to program. On the hypothesis the girls wanted a more social experience, we also included several of her female friends. All 3 kids began with similar skill. The boys became very interested and now work in programming. The girl lost interest, saying that programming wasn't people-oriented enough. This was even though I devoted extra energy to programming with her, including designing a talking calculator that entered numbers to the voice of a friend and output answers to the voice of our daughter.

One might guess that her lack of persistence in programming was due to one of Summers' other two hypotheses, #1 that females were less likely to choose interests demanding intense commitment, or #3 that females are constrained by social norms. But these don't fit because my daughter is a Captain in the US Army, in airborne field artillery, commanding a battery with a hundred soldiers, 99% of whom are male.

Interestingly, Summers was instrumental in my daughter choosing this career path. As a result of Summers in 2001 initiating the movement to return ROTC to elite colleges, my daughter got to meet inspiring leaders in the military and chose to do ROTC. When others in the military ask her why she majored in neuroscience in college, she replies that neuroscience is the operating manual for people.

So the answer may be none of Summers' three hypotheses. It may be that women prefer people-oriented endeavors, a conclusion that came to light as a result of Summers' challenge to explore the issue.

From my perspective Summers was instrumental in encouraging females to excel in fields that had been male-dominated. Sheryl Sandberg, one of the most successful women in high tech, for whom Summers was a mentor, would probably say the same about Summers.

This article was helpful in clearing the air about Summers and women in the workforce. But I would go father and point out that some of us see Summers is a hero on this issue for encouraging thought and experimentation, and for directly encouraging women.

Expand full comment
SlowlyReading's avatar

Thank you. Important! Another account:

https://thoughtsofstone.com/the-day-the-logic-died/

Back then, people would say, "Haha, academics are just crazy!" But the fact that history repeated itself with James Damore at Google years later should have been proof enough that no, it's not just crazy college kids doing crazy college things, but actually, this malignant ideology of lies and deceit is on a successful long march through all institutions, including the most powerful corporations in the world.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts