If women only organizations are acceptable, then so are men only organizations. Enough of the double-standard. And YES, BOTH types should exist, as well as co-ed.
A good model to follow is that of Harvard's conservatives in the 1970s, who were also ridiculed as losers. Conservatives learned to be tougher than anyone else because they were constantly being challenged and they had the resilience to rise to the challenge. Some went on to become leaders of the conservative movement nationally. The NYT did a great article on this; here is an unlocked link (I don't know how long it lasts or how many uses):
Lmao calling other people noble losers and sanctimonious while you oppose male only clubs as a “conservative” at Harvard University of all places is beyond parody. You can’t rationally convince people in modern politics because the entire premise of modernity is to build politics without God which necessarily devolves into irrational emotivism. Do you not even read Macintyre at Harvard? This political regime inevitably leads to the progressive side winning due to political incentive structure of creating ever new client groups go give them more power (see the sexual revolution and mass migration). In fact to fight within the bounds of the Whig view of history as you do is what constitutes being a noble loser, and those that form power structures outside the rigged game by appealing to premodern politics are the only ones actually doing real fighting rather than shadow boxing. If you think ARC or Robby George are going to meaningfully change anything rather than just act as a pressure valve for disaffected gentiles then you’re kidding yourself.
Throughout human history, principled Christians have suffered persecution by others.
Christ, himself, was the first example. Most of the original apostles were killed, either by Roman authority or by angry locals. Many of America's most prominent Christian denominations came to America to escape persecution by European Catholics. Latter-day Saints, my own denomination, were violently persecuted here in America during their early years; there was, at one time, an "extermination order" against our founder, Joseph Smith, issued by certain State governments in early 19th century America. Many Christians identify with the "noble loser" sentiment.
Matthew 5 reads ...
10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.
The "noble loser" on the Harvard campus is actually a manifestation of a very long standing theme in the history of humanity.
Ultra left-wing values and expressions seem much more important when performed in front of one's peers. Once college is over and the torrent of new opinions and expressions come your way, many people modify or transmute those hard core convictions, unless they become politicians, of course. Take joy in the many laughable ideas that college brings to light and consider yourselves superior.
Take heart, noble losers. While you are correct in your conclusion that using facts and reason to change the minds of your woke colleagues is a fool's errand, there are still effective ways to make a difference on campus, and in the world. And that is through merciless mockery. Saul Alinsky said it best in his Rules for Radicals no. 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." So take heart and lift your voice in song, joining the Babbling Beaver in a hearty rendition of the hit ballad "Mockery is the Best Policy." Sound on, and follow the lyrics at - https://babblingbeaver.com/2026/04/02/mockery-is-the-best-policy/
If women only organizations are acceptable, then so are men only organizations. Enough of the double-standard. And YES, BOTH types should exist, as well as co-ed.
A good model to follow is that of Harvard's conservatives in the 1970s, who were also ridiculed as losers. Conservatives learned to be tougher than anyone else because they were constantly being challenged and they had the resilience to rise to the challenge. Some went on to become leaders of the conservative movement nationally. The NYT did a great article on this; here is an unlocked link (I don't know how long it lasts or how many uses):
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/politics/politicsspecial1/robertss-harvard-roots-a-movement-was-stirring.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zVA.tO3g.GvhPPQjAd9yI&smid=url-share
Lmao calling other people noble losers and sanctimonious while you oppose male only clubs as a “conservative” at Harvard University of all places is beyond parody. You can’t rationally convince people in modern politics because the entire premise of modernity is to build politics without God which necessarily devolves into irrational emotivism. Do you not even read Macintyre at Harvard? This political regime inevitably leads to the progressive side winning due to political incentive structure of creating ever new client groups go give them more power (see the sexual revolution and mass migration). In fact to fight within the bounds of the Whig view of history as you do is what constitutes being a noble loser, and those that form power structures outside the rigged game by appealing to premodern politics are the only ones actually doing real fighting rather than shadow boxing. If you think ARC or Robby George are going to meaningfully change anything rather than just act as a pressure valve for disaffected gentiles then you’re kidding yourself.
Nothing I've heard indicates that the end of Harvard is the truth
Throughout human history, principled Christians have suffered persecution by others.
Christ, himself, was the first example. Most of the original apostles were killed, either by Roman authority or by angry locals. Many of America's most prominent Christian denominations came to America to escape persecution by European Catholics. Latter-day Saints, my own denomination, were violently persecuted here in America during their early years; there was, at one time, an "extermination order" against our founder, Joseph Smith, issued by certain State governments in early 19th century America. Many Christians identify with the "noble loser" sentiment.
Matthew 5 reads ...
10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.
The "noble loser" on the Harvard campus is actually a manifestation of a very long standing theme in the history of humanity.
A bit off topic, but ...
I heard there is a federal law, still on the books from the 1950s, which makes it illegal for avowed communists to hold elected office.
When will someone enforce that law against Zoran Mamdani?
Ultra left-wing values and expressions seem much more important when performed in front of one's peers. Once college is over and the torrent of new opinions and expressions come your way, many people modify or transmute those hard core convictions, unless they become politicians, of course. Take joy in the many laughable ideas that college brings to light and consider yourselves superior.
Take heart, noble losers. While you are correct in your conclusion that using facts and reason to change the minds of your woke colleagues is a fool's errand, there are still effective ways to make a difference on campus, and in the world. And that is through merciless mockery. Saul Alinsky said it best in his Rules for Radicals no. 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." So take heart and lift your voice in song, joining the Babbling Beaver in a hearty rendition of the hit ballad "Mockery is the Best Policy." Sound on, and follow the lyrics at - https://babblingbeaver.com/2026/04/02/mockery-is-the-best-policy/